SUBTITLES:
Subtitles prepared by human
00:00
[♪ INTRO ]
Conversations with new people can be sort
of terrifying.
I mean, they can also be awesome!
There’s always a chance you’re about to
learn something fascinating or add a cool
new friend to your life.
But you are making a first impression.
And at some point, you might be left with
a creeping sense of, “Did they actually like me?”
Most of us are willing to believe that other
people find us perfectly tolerable.
But it can be hard to tell whether they liked
you enough to want to spend time with you again.
Psychologists think that we might be too hard
on ourselves, though.
Most of the time, people probably like you
better after talking to you than you think they do.
It’s called the liking gap.
But if you know it’s there… well, maybe
you can chill out about first impressions
and just enjoy your time with new people.
Psychologists have been studying meta-accuracy,
or your ability to correctly judge others’
feelings about you, for a long time.
But the study that gave the liking gap its
name was published in 2018 in the journal
Psychological Science.
It looked at participants’ encounters with
new people in five different experiments.
Some of the experiments asked undergrads to
talk with new people for five minutes or for
as long as they liked.
In others, participants spoke with people
they met at a workshop or reported on their
01:03
relationships with their roommates over the
course of their freshman year of college.
The researchers found that participants consistently
underestimated how much their partner liked
them, and assumed they’d enjoyed the conversation
more than their partner had, no matter how
long or short the conversation.
Being shy predicted an even bigger liking
gap.
And the roommates?
They kept experiencing the liking gap in all
the check-ins throughout the academic year,
except for the very last one in May.
While this could suggest you’ll eventually
figure out that people really do like you,
the gap might have gone away because by then,
they discussed how they got along and decided
whether or not they wanted to live together
again.
It’s worth noting that we’re not talking
about social anxiety disorder here.
While social anxiety disorder is all about
the fear of being negatively judged or rejected
in social situations, it’s a much more intense
anxiety that affects your day-to-day life
and your ability to spend time with friends
and family.
That’s probably best treated by a psychiatrist
or therapist.
The liking gap is a less extreme, more universal
tendency to underestimate how much other people like you.
And it’s actually kind of surprising that
it exists, because people usually think they’re great at stuff.
02:05
Studies have repeatedly found a better-than-average
effect, where people tend to think they’re
better than the average person at things like
driving a car.
Even though obviously we can’t all be better
than average, because, you know, math.
But there are a number of factors that can
help explain the liking gap.
One is the situation itself, because conversations
can be stressful.
Something as simple as wanting to present
yourself well has been shown to change the
way people evaluate their performance.
Conversations are also hard.
Like literally cognitively demanding.
You have to listen while also mentally rehearsing
that clever anecdote you’re about to tell
and then oh no wait the moment went by it
would be weird if you told it now and then
ack, what was a question?
Which means that we often aren’t paying
attention to the subtle cues other people are giving us.
But even if you are, researchers have suggested
that people might not provide enough useful
feedback for you to come to the conclusion
that they like you, either out of politeness
or out of a fear of being rejected themselves.
For instance, one 1972 study of nearly 200
undergraduates found that people tend to hold
back both positive and negative evaluations
of others, especially when they’re not very
03:06
close to the person they’re making judgments
about.
So given that conversations are messy and
confusing, we often base our estimates of
how much other people like us on the best
set of data we have: our own views of ourselves.
Which can be… misguided.
Psychologists have suggested that you guess
what other people are thinking of you by taking
baby steps away from your own point of view
until you reach something that seems plausible.
But, of course, we’re super biased about
what’s plausible.
For one thing, you might not be taking into
account the fact that people you’ve never
met tend to assume that you conform to social
norms.
They expect you to be kind, because most people
are kind to strangers and don’t start yelling
at them with no provocation.
This isn’t the Sims.
But also, researchers have found that social
situations make people focus much more on
their own failings.
Which makes evolutionary sense: it’s good
to learn from your social mistakes so that
you don’t get kicked off the island.
You also have a lot of previous experiences
to compare yourself against, so you might
notice that your performance in this conversation
is considerably less great than all the other
conversations you’ve ever had.
That badly delivered punchline sticks out
like a sore thumb to you.
04:07
In other words: We judge ourselves too harshly,
and then assume other people are making judgments similar to ours.
Resulting in… a liking gap.
This isn’t something you can just change
about your brain overnight.
But just knowing that the liking gap exists
can be kind of comforting.
Because the people you meet probably like
you more than you think they do, and that’s
honestly kind of awesome news.
Thanks for watching this episode of SciShow
Psych!
I’ll just tell you straight up and leave
the guesswork out of it: If you’re a fan
of free resources for science education, we like you a lot.
And hey, we have something in common!
You also might be interested in joining our
community over on Patreon, whose support is
what allowed us to create this channel in
the first place.
Just go to patreon.com/scishow to check it out!
[ ♪OUTRO ]
Watch, read, educate! © 2022