The Lies of Yusuf Estes

The Lies of Yusuf Estes

SUBTITLE'S INFO:

Language: English

Type: Robot

Number of phrases: 402

Number of words: 2802

Number of symbols: 12396

DOWNLOAD SUBTITLES:

DOWNLOAD AUDIO AND VIDEO:

SUBTITLES:

Subtitles generated by robot
00:02
[Music] and the more I talk to them the more I could see lie after lie after lie and finally I said you know what I don't need to be in a religion full of liars Sheikh Yusuf Estes calls the authors of the Bible Liars he calls Christianity a religion of liars since he describes himself as a former Christian preacher his testimony can sound weighty many Muslims assume
00:38
that they don't need to study the Bible for themselves since he already has we will examine Shaikh Estes claims so that you can see who is truly lying to you our hope is that instead of taking others words on the matter you will study the Bible for yourself and follow the Jesus you find there the impression of many Muslims is that Sheikh s has held a position in the Christian Church similar to that of an imam but he sometimes admits he was never a priest
01:09
or a pastor he was simply someone who led singing and occasionally spoke in the church well first of all a lot of people think I was a preacher but more than anything and churches I was more of a music minister because I spent my time with pianos organs music and and the sales of musical instruments so as far as the preaching I only filled in when the preacher wasn't going to be there so
01:39
then I would give this sermons Sheikh Estes his humor and eloquence give the impression that he is a knowledgeable and honest man but the reality is that he consistently lies about the Bible and the Christian faith here is what he says about Christianity after all Christianity is the easiest religion in the world there isn't anything easier than Christianity you just say the magic words you don't have to pray you don't
02:12
have to fast you don't have to make Hajj you don't have to pace the car you don't have to grow a beard you don't have to wear a hijab you don't have to do anything except hope that it's gonna work there are people who call themselves Christians and have such views just as there are people who call themselves Muslims and ignored the teachings of the Quran people who pick and choose what they believe should not be used to define Islam but Shaykh Estes uses
02:46
people like this to define Christianity compare his claims with what Jesus actually said in the Bible if any man will come after me let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me for whosoever will save his life shall lose it and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it anyone who claims that Christianity is the easiest religion in the world is
03:16
defining it very very differently than Jesus did the cross Jesus calls his disciples to take up was not a piece of jewelry but the instrument of their own death as to sheikh estes his claim about saying magic words jesus said not everyone that saith unto me Lord Lord shall enter into the kingdom of heaven but he that doeth the will of my father which is in heaven many will say to me in that day Lord Lord have we not
03:48
prophesied in thy name and in thy name have cast out devils and in thy name done many wonderful works and then will I profess unto them I never knew you depart from me ye that work iniquity shake Estus knows what the Bible says but instead of dealing with its actual teachings he tries to discredit it by misrepresentation so we want to talk about the Bible and tell him about the
04:21
message that comes in the Bible what we were trying to do it though the priest he had a different Bible because the Catholic Bible doesn't really match the Protestant Bible then my father had a different Bible that he had had since he was little and then my wife had a different Bible so we had four five different Bibles sitting on the table talking about oh no my Bible is right no your Bible is wrong no this Bible over here now it says but I could use part of that Bible the Bible and then I realized my friend the Muslim
04:52
he's sitting over there like this watching us argue about the Bible so I turned to him and I said how many versions of that Quran do you guys have how many versions and he said actually we don't have versions it's only one one caught on I said huh Wow Shaikh Estes loves to present the Bible as confusing because there are different
05:24
English translations from the original Hebrew and Greek he not only ignores that there are different English translations of the Quran but there are different versions in Arabic as well many Muslims just simply have this simplistic idea that there has only been one version of the Quran throughout history and and that's the version that we holding now and when we read our history we see in fact that there were variations multiple readings that were a sanction that multiple readings that are
05:54
sanctioned in our tradition and they do not know how to come to grips with that the first question which arose in my mind when I began studying and teaching the subject was that currently there are five different versions of the Quran found in the Muslim Ummah now this might be a startling revelation for most of you but then for academic circles this is nothing new so we have five different versions of the Quran circulating in the Muslim Ummah we have this famous version or I would say the avaya of huffs from
06:26
Assam which is the Quran which is taught in most parts of the Muslim Ummah and which is known to most of us and these gorons as I would point out are actually named after a famous reciter witch who used to recite the Quran in a particular way and when I say reciter it does not mean it does not merely refer to pronunciation it also refers to variation in words so when I say there are five versions it means that they are five different versions which have different words at times they are words
06:58
which are different there are nouns which are different there is a difference between the plural and singular there are difference between declensions or the Arab and then we have other differences as well Sheikh s s also pretends that any scribal error in any manuscript makes the Bible untrustworthy even if they are easily corrected he pretends the Quran doesn't have the same issues I'm gonna ask you what are the chances
07:27
that somebody's speaking out of you the Arabic language living 1,400 years ago in the desert could recite 6237 verses all in Arabic and have it exactly memorized and passed down for 30 generations without a single loss of a
08:00
single word or even a vowel marker or even a dot it's impossible except if it came from Allah despite a guess toises claims the quran has not been perfectly preserved the fourth question which confronted me in this regard was that as I read through various research manuals and histories of the Quran I found and
08:32
obviously it is something which is a established nature that the Quran we have today has scribal errors scriptural error script errors in the script and we find that these are numerous thus for example we have extra vowels mentioned in various places which are regarded as redundant they are written but they are regarded as redundant by the oral tradition we have extra ellipse we have extra jaws and we have extra valves Sheikh Estes will often quote the Bible
09:02
when it agrees with him but then claims it is contradictory or corrupted when it disagrees with him when he can't dismiss a text entirely he simply lies about it here he was questioned about the opening of John's Gospel where it says in the beginning was the word and the Word was with God and the Word was God the word was god actually it said in even connais greek the word god it didn't say was in the past tense or
09:35
future or present tense of any verb it just said the word god not only would shake estes is reading word god make no sense but every Greek manuscript of John's Gospel has the verb he says isn't there literally it reads Theo's God pain was haha goes the word the Word was with
10:04
God so there is distinction yet the Word was God so there is identity John is explicitly saying that in the beginning Jesus already was God che against us doesn't want to admit that so he lies about the Greek and then tries to confuse things even more is because you took this and I don't know how you could get a reference to any
10:35
person at all there's no name mentioned here and there's no name mentioned in my Bible even it just said in the beginning was the word the Word was with God it said the Word was God but of course we know that that's not what it says and the word became flesh but it doesn't say anybody's name this could apply to Adam because it applied to you and me it
11:05
could apply to anybody Sheikh Estes ignores that John made very clear who the word is was made flesh and dwelt among us and we beheld his glory the glory as of the only begotten of the Father full of grace and truth John bear witness of him and cried saying this was he of whom I spake he that cometh after me is preferred before me for he was before me and of his fullness have all we received and grace
11:40
for grace for the law was given by Moses but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ she guessed us not only tries to rewrite john's gospel but dismiss everything written by the apostle paul according to bible paul's real name was saul he was a Pharisee according to other stories christian history he was engaged to the daughter of the high priest
12:11
another Pharisee her name was papa historically we know about her because she's mentioned in the works of Josephus and she couldn't stand this man he was an ugly-looking person according to the Bible - he was not attractive so she left she broke off the engagement by leaving she left her dad or she left her house she left her religion she became an actress a stage person I don't know if they would really acting or dancing
12:44
what she did but Caesar married her she married Caesar the Jewish high priest was not a Pharisee but a sad you see these groups were bitter enemies this kind of confusion is equivalent to someone who claims to be knowledgeable about Islam and yet claiming that the Saudi royal family are Shiites as with most of his claims Sheikh Estes does not give the source of his information his
13:17
claims are partially based on the writings of a 4th century Christian by the name of epifanio's he wrote about various groups of heretics including one called the Ebionites he quotes them as saying about the Apostle Paul they then claimed that he was Greek and the son of a Greek mother and Greek father but that he had gone up to Jerusalem stayed there for a while desired to marry a daughter of the high priest and had therefore become a proselyte and been circumcised but since
13:48
he still could not marry that sort of girl he became angry and wrote against circumcision and against the Sabbath and the legislation you may notice that many of the details Sheikh Estes gave are missing because they've simply been made up there was a woman named papaya who married the Emperor Nero but she was not the daughter of the high priest or even a Jew the MU Knights who made the claim that Paul was not a Jew also denied the
14:18
virgin birth of Jesus but Sheikh Estes considers them good witnesses so long as they dislike Paul his final papers were given to him to go to Damac Damascus in Syria where he was going to persecute again the people of the way along the way he said he had a blinding light experience Jesus talked to him and he became Paul and began getting all kinds
14:51
of spiritual revelation through dreams divisions etc and everything he had was from that you never know other than through these blinding light experiences or whatever the world shake estes is trying to give the impression that paul was a greek who was sharing mystical experiences that contradicted what jesus and the other apostles taught it's a lie if you will only read the Bible for yourself you will find that
15:21
Paul carefully reasons from the Old Testament and that he is presenting the same gospel as Jesus and the other apostles sheikh estes also presents other wild claims as real history the Catholic Church was in business about 300 years before Jesus was born it's on their website don't go like this it's on their website that's why I took it from the Catholic Church was really started in Rome by Alexander the Great do you
15:54
know what the word Catholic means it means universal it was the universal Church for the Roman Empire if you didn't join it you could not be a Roman citizen and it was opposed to the teachings of Judaism and opposed to the teachings of the early Christians for more than 200 in some years and they were diametrically opposed to each other to the extent that it was the Romans killing the early Christians now if you understand that
16:26
and you go to their website and read they didn't even take over Christianity until the year 325 80 and when they did they changed a lot of things again referring to their own website but if you want to check it in branagh Britannica or Americana or grow your encyclopedias go ahead and read about the Catholic Church Shaykh Estes trust that most of his audience won't check the Catholic Church's website or the Encyclopedia Britannica because if they
16:56
did they would find out he's lying Alexander the Great's Empire did not include Rome and there's no evidence he ever visited there the idea that Xander created the Catholic Church hundreds of years before Jesus has simply make-believe there are also numerous false claims that shake Estes makes against the Council of Nicaea and other events in Christian history but one of the easiest to disprove is this one yes so you know 60 years ago when I
17:29
was a little guy going to church nobody said Jesus was Lord or son or God they only said son of God Jesus is called Lord hundreds of times in the Bible but Sheikh Estes claims that the church only really embraced it in the 1960s another claim that he often makes is that the term Trinity has found nowhere in the Bible though he's technically correct he's trying to confuse his audience he is taking a
18:00
Latin word coined in the 3rd century to summarize what the Bible says about the relationship of the Father Jesus and the Holy Spirit he says that because this specific term is not used in the Bible the truth that describes is not there either by sheikh estes is standard muslims should not speak of tawheed or Shahada because neither term is found in the pages of the quran throughout the New Testament Jesus is identified as God
18:31
rather than dealing with what the Bible actually says Sheikh Estes tries to confuse his audience with lies and tries to make Christianity appear ridiculous he says can you talk to me about your belief in God what do you believe about God was God is one he said do you have Trinity yes God is 3 said I thought you said he's 1 he is 1 and 3 he said how does that work because God can do
19:02
anything Sheikh Yusuf Estes calls the authors of the Bible liars and he calls Christianity a religion of liars the reality is that he is the one who is the liar we have another video that helps sort out what the Bible actually says from what others say about it it's available free at www.cronicbeats.com [Music]

DOWNLOAD SUBTITLES: