Facebook Whistleblowers LEAK DOCS Detailing Effort to Secretly Censor Vax Concerns on Global Scale

Facebook Whistleblowers LEAK DOCS Detailing Effort to Secretly Censor Vax Concerns on Global Scale

SUBTITLE'S INFO:

Language: English

Type: Robot

Number of phrases: 694

Number of words: 3949

Number of symbols: 18359

DOWNLOAD SUBTITLES:

DOWNLOAD AUDIO AND VIDEO:

SUBTITLES:

Subtitles generated by robot
00:00
i have to do something when it comes time to standing up for a world i want my children to live in i don't want to leave them a world to where they don't have these liberties people aren't allowed to have voice and yet facebook counts itself with promoting people's opportunity to have voice they're trying to control this content before it even makes it onto your page before you even see it
00:36
[Music] we have just obtained multiple leaked documents from inside facebook this time detailing a plan to curb quote vaccine hesitancy on a global scale it was so concerning it brought us not one but two whistleblowers from inside facebook who are ready to speak out on what this means for free speech and public discourse on their own platform facebook uses classifiers in their algorithms to determine certain content to be what they call vaccine hesitant
01:08
where they call the vaccine hesitancy and without the user's knowledge they assign a score to these comments that's called the vh score the vaccine hesitancy score and based on that score we'll demo or leave the comment alone depending on the content within the comment our first facebook insider is a data center technician who leaked us multiple internal documents detailing an algorithm test being run on 1.5 percent of facebook and instagram's nearly 3.8 billion users worldwide the goal to quote
01:39
drastically reduce user exposure to vaccine hesitancy in comments it's the same thing you'll see a lot of this difference in their public policy versus the private policy where the public policy is very vague it's very ambiguous it's designed to be questioned because it's designed to be able to easily defend but then if you look at the private policy it's much more clear much more specific i think that they're trying to make it seem like they're not doing as much or that they're just kind of like generalizing it like oh we have some robot that just tags your post and then you know we look at it but i think they don't want people to know oh
02:11
no we actually have something that we made specifically for vaccine has tendency so the main document along with uh all the attachments and stuff that goes with it so basically when they write this algorithm it goes through facebook content and it looks for certain keywords uh that are related to vaccination or you know not getting a vaccine and stuff like that and it gives it a score and the va score means vacuum to vacuum testing c which is defined as being hesitant to get a vaccine but not just like well i don't know it's it's even well i saw a study that said that
02:42
someone died they got the vaccine that's vaccine decency so this is a beta test this is all a beta test right and and how big is this uh beta test we refer to the test size as one point five percent i'm exactly which sure which pool that pulls from but i think it's comments on authoritative health pages you seem to think that they've already rolled this out why do we believe they've already rolled this out in one slot slideshow that they had they called their uh weekly progress tracker how they actually lay all this out in the chart and you can see it
03:13
you look at the slides they go by date so we've got here copenhagen back safety and efficacy global currently global 13 languages facebook plus instagram i'll see 19 vaccine global currently global 66 languages and the very first thing that uh that brought me to the conclusion that they're they wanted to do this globally is they were developing in like you know as many languages as they could get their hands on so this is like a product launch almost yes yeah in their last quarterly report they reported 2.79 billion people on earth use some kind of facebook app who's behind this new algorithm policy
03:43
well one thing is for sure the authors of this experiment julio howe nick gibeon hendrik townley amit ball and matt gills are not low-level employees in fact one of the internal documents project veritas obtained was a facebook flowchart that showed they are only a few clicks away from mark zuckerberg himself who makes these decisions uh these are teams at facebook and they call themselves they work with what they call b2v
04:13
barriers to vaccination so that's one of their core terms is barriers to vaccination and then the people on these teams they call them health integrity teams so there's a health integrity team for messenger there's a health integrity team for every system that facebook is an integrity team is it came out about after march 2020 in cobit this is something that's that's that's existed yes so we have health integrity teams and barrier to vaccination teams this at facebook he's a research scientist for the core data science team on
04:44
facebook he also works in health integrity everyone who works on this project works in health integrity this is the uh experiment launch post as you can see this is on april 16th this is 2021 that's why there's no year there because this is this year um and hendrick townley is one of the software engineers that works on this there were i think it was him and two other software engineers and then ami ball wrote the actual classifier itself i don't i'm sure he had like a team of developers but he is considered the one who wrote it i mean ball and then as you go up it's like his boss boss's boss
05:13
bosses bosses so amit ball works for ud weisenberg who works for nicolas steer do i have that correct and and that person works for danny ferrante and that person works for javier olivier and javier olivier reports directly to mark zuckerberg so there's a chain that goes all the way down to to a meatball this kind of censorship sounds similar to shadow banning when users are unaware of their posts can't be seen a term one of our own investigations coined when exposing twitter just a few years ago but this time we're exposing facebook and instagram's
05:46
methods to quash an entire side of a conversation arguably one of the most pressing issues of the day according to these documents facebook tiers users zero to five and a score zero to one can you talk a little about this tier system yeah so basically this is what they're using to structure uh how how they're gonna judge this content uh on on on a scale to how vaccine hesitant it actually is or if it's explicitly just discouraging in my opinion the main reason why they built this was for the human uh robotical readers
06:18
so that they can use this as a reference when they so if the algorithm can't make a decision on a certain post it'll send it to a human rater and then the human reader looks at it and they will make a decision on whether or not it's vaccine or not so we have tier two indirect discouragement and what happens when you are a tier 2. basically your comment is going to be suppressed uh as to the scale of that suppression uh it's just it's hard to say you have to look at like a case-by-case basis but what they're saying is it's going to get they call it a position change on some of these comments you can see it'll
06:50
say position change seven and i'm not sure whether the seven refers to like a seven percent or if it's just like seven positions down in the comment change so it's suppressed yes we don't know the extent of the suppression and we've heard shadow ban we've heard deboost i have not heard position change facebook has not been shy about combating vaccine hesitancy as reported in their own press release dated may 11 of this year however what they say publicly in their own policy doesn't scratch the surface
07:19
of what is written in these internal leaked documents by the facebook whistleblower if i read this correctly facebook is saying it doesn't matter if the story is true so long as it doesn't cause people to hesitate getting the vaccine what's your read on this the borderline vaccine framework shopping stories potentially or actually true events or facts that can raise safety concerns that post was done by a user and they've taken a screenshot and and observed it for the tier system right what about
07:50
this gives them alarm uh how is this not scary that that would be considered indirect discouragement indirect discouragement which should be considered tier two so this is an example of indirect discouragement of the vaccine trusting the vaccine questioning anything involving the vaccine this was then demoted on facebook so this is another example of tier two indirect discouragement why don't you tell us why this would be indirect discouragement according to facebook so this would be considered acting hesitant because they don't want people to see someone had a bad effect
08:20
they're not saying don't get the vaccine but they're saying look at all this negative stuff that happened after i got the vaccine to the reporting facts but truth doesn't matter no because it doesn't match the narrative so and the narrative being get the vaccine the vaccine is good for you everyone should get it and if you don't you will be singled out right as an enemy of society so the va er is the uh vaccine adverse event reporting system it looks like they're measuring the comments where they're mentioning you know the patient time so is vera is a cdc
08:51
uh supported program yes i think so really they support all this because you know they release the standards and seriously themselves that's really one of one of the primary things that facebook is basing their policy off of is well if you looked at the public policy it would be according to the authoritative health pages so they are open about the fact that they essentially coordinate with the cdc here from the internal document content pointing to the vaccine adverse effects reporting system data that suggests extreme
09:22
risk without providing full context full context what do they mean by that i think so like uh in the previous comments like she said oh uh during this study 653 people died and then they don't put the rest of study in there it's like okay so you want me to write like a 10 page comment right what's full context what is another ambiguous term if they saw a study from someone they didn't like would they say well that's not the full context because abcdefg ultimately it seems like any facts that escape a particular narrative are omitted
09:53
demoted de-boosted banned yes considered dangerous to society express it in any way possible where do you think this is headed does it get worse from here yes how so i think people accept it and they see people like twitter facebook google and stuff like that they see that this is accepted by the public and then they go that's like a green light oh we can go ahead and do this more so not only are we going to start doing vaccine stuff we're going to spread it to everything so we're going to start saying oh uh if you make a post that could put somebody in danger or it could compromise someone's safety
10:25
whatever that means then we're going to go ahead and look at that and assign that a score of someone a classifier who knows what it could be they're trying to control this content before it even makes it onto your page before you even see it when you're scrolling on your phone i think they're afraid of what people would conclude sounds like they don't think about the underlying values that would work they're not even thinking about that um and do you think there's a lot of people inside facebook that agree with you or some percentage what would you estimate that number of people to be
10:58
i would say at least 25 so you're telling me that 25 of the people there agree that what they're doing with this vaccine hesitancy coding and algorithms is morally wrong yes that would not strike me at all the policy is going to keep expanding until anything can violate it what would happen if this was scaled larger and scaled to twitter and the internet as a whole is way worse than anything that can happen
11:28
for me getting fired from my job to me that it far outweighs that because it's more about more than me it's about it really everyone in the world it's clear this facebook insider is not alone and his concerns of facebook's new policy that will demote discourse on vaccines in general as a matter of fact the next insider you're about to meet felt so compelled to come forward he goes so far as to compare the new policy to an abusive relationship what do you do at facebook i'm a data center engineer i'd say that
12:01
uh in a sense it's prohibiting uh people from being able to have an open dialogue about issues that affect their personal security some of these things the questions the comments that are being presented you know from people that have concerns about uh their personal health or their personal security being affected it's kind of like having a relationship with somebody that's controlling and abusive in a sense like an abusive partner not allowing their spouse to speak out about the things that are going on in their marriage or their relationship and limiting their voice is
12:33
very damaging from that sense you know if you think about this logically it just you know it's very incriminating in my opinion just months ago this same insider leaked us a tape of mark zuckerberg privately speaking to his team last july showcasing his own vaccine hesitancy when talking about coving i do just want to make sure that i share some caution on this because we just don't know the long-term side effects of basically modifying people's dna and rna today his own
13:05
words would violate their new public policy you were the source that brought us the mark zuckerberg vaccine footage from july 2020 is that correct that's cool zuckerberg seemed to change his mind evolve on the issue of vaccine and the facebook policy itself would have prevented zuckerberg from saying what it is that he had said just a few months ago pretty crazy um what what prompted you to to give that footage to project veritas uh based on my own knowledge and research
13:36
of you know the adverse effects and potential side effects of vaccines of any medication really so i think it's important for people to be understanding of the of those facts we're able to have these conversations at work with our with our co-workers about our medical decisions and we do we have them you know frequently uh why is it okay for us to have these conversations that work as adults and not have somebody step in and say hey you need to stop talking about that and you shouldn't talk about that you're not allowed to talk about that fact check
14:07
that's false occasionally people do in the conversation but we're allowed to have open dialogue and here you're saying that you you can have these conversations at the water cooler in an office absolutely in the midst of the office at facebook the location facebook but you're not allowed to go onto facebook and write this stuff that's ironic what is your message to mr ceo mark zuckerberg who is certainly watching this video
14:37
i would ask uh you said that you support freedom of expression my question to you is um why in a sense you don't support freedom of expression in the most basic sense uh that's available to all people everywhere which is to exist as god created them without any interference or intrusion by any corporation or government to exist as they are and why push the narrative that it's not okay for people to go ahead and exist
15:09
to express themselves as god's creation without taking a vaccine why is there this push to suppress that ideology this insider's biggest concern is facebook building a quote community of compliance unquote and feels the topic may go beyond the authority of zuckerberg himself it's the platform that they want to build it's the community that they want to build they want to build a community where everybody complies not where people can have open discourse and dialogue about the most personal and private
15:40
and intimate decisions that anybody could ever face in their life which is regarding their own body their own health and based upon your position and what you've seen in your role at facebook why do they want people to comply why is that the culture of facebook uh for uh it's a promotion of a society that is focused on uh medical uh medical progress in a sense or medical you know medical experimentation
16:11
what is facebook doing to promote covered vaccines to billions of users um specifically encouraging people to post uh you know to take on the profile uh frame for uh showing that they've uh been vaccinated and uh to promote in a sense solidarity amongst other people that have taken the vaccine and encouraged users to also go and get the vaccine um it's interesting they would you know encourage one side but not allow the other side to speak um of you know why they wouldn't be
16:42
uh making a decision to get a vaccine there's no solidarity there's no opportunity to be united around that it's just basically get the vaccine or feel left out you know people aren't allowed to have voice and yet you know facebook touts itself with promoting people's opportunity to have voice and you know stated before you know having a voice about the most important decisions anyone has to face in their life is pretty important and it's shocking and disturbing really to see people that are willing to go to the
17:14
lengths of limiting those discussions around the world you know for things that that concern people's own personal security i almost feel like there's there's outside sources pressuring mark or could be i'm not saying that's a fact but you know it does make me concerned and you look at the video with valjean you know mark discussing it mark doesn't seem too pleased with you know the fact that he had to bring it up it's almost like he was you know he had to mention it these two brave insiders know they risk it all standing against facebook one of the most powerful
17:46
institutions of the day yet they are still putting it all on the line in order to preserve our liberties i think that's also the main reason why people don't want to come out with it because what if i you know i have i have two kids i have you know my wife and if i lose my job it's like what do i do but that's less of a concern to me and the people who may do what you did next but they're not sure if they should do it what's your message to those people
18:17
i'd say go ahead and do it and i just think about what i said there's a lot of blow back to telling the truth and that's true as far as human history is concerned and yeah you are going to receive blowback but just wait wait it out can you live with yourself for the rest of your life you work your facebook and you knew about this especially if it came out later you're like man i saw that so many times i could have said something and i didn't how are you gonna feel about that that's my thing my morality i have to show somebody this because at least even if nothing were to come of this and for some reason everything was
18:49
scrapped i would still think that it was worth like well at least i tried i tried to show somebody this it's almost like you're saying that your desire to follow your conscience outweighs any potential risk there might be to you from doing this yes what is your message to those people that are watching this who agree with you inside facebook i won't say that you're not alone um the biggest thing with social media uh that we've seen throughout the years is
19:18
that ranking people's comments their posts uh even even like news media there's this view that tries to make you think that you're alone in this and you're not the majority and even people that say that they agree with it internally they deal with struggles internally they question things it's just that they're not able to overcome that that cognitive dissonance that sits in and they resort to what is safe
19:49
it's easier to comply with things than it is to come forward and say this is wrong or to really awaken to understanding that the way you're being treated or the way other people are being treated is wrong and so that's challenging but know that you're not alone and that if you do come forward and you do speak up that you can live peacefully knowing that you did the right thing no matter what and that's encouraging not just to other people but it's also encouraging to yourself
20:20
it's and it won't make you feel as alone anymore that's very profound i think i'm a father so you know obviously like i fear for my family for my children's safety and uh but i also understand that i have to as i told you know my wife i have to do something you know when it comes time to standing up for a world i want my children to live in i don't want to leave them a world to where they don't have these liberties these personal securities to where they can
20:51
willingly make their own medical decisions between them their doctor and those that are closest to them uh that's not something i can live in that's not something i could do and it came down to the point where i had to make a decision to do what was right mario with project veritas uh really quick sent you an email here a few minutes ago i'm not sure if you've seen it yet uh requesting comment we've obtained documents here from facebook uh talking about vaccine hesitancy it's an internal document
21:25
uh it's pretty uh classified according to what we've seen we've attached it in the email we were wondering if you could provide us some comment on that okay come on okay thank you and uh when can we expect a response by i'll take a look now okay excellent i will be looking forward to that okay thank you
22:18
be brave do something follow their lead visit veritas tips at protonmail.com

DOWNLOAD SUBTITLES: